(no subject)
Dec. 31st, 2004 09:46 pmlooking for a definition of the annoying term "neoconservative", i came across this pole at the Christian Science Monitor. as with all polls, my final scores tend to be "about right" or "sort of right". i seem to have issues with absolute answer tests, no doubt because i'm so bloody gray. in this poll, i'm a realist. interesting.
Realists…
* Are guided more by practical considerations than ideological vision
* Believe US power is crucial to successful diplomacy - and vice versa
* Don't want US policy options unduly limited by world opinion or ethical considerations
* Believe strong alliances are important to US interests
* Weigh the political costs of foreign action
* Believe foreign intervention must be dictated by compelling national interest
Historical realist: President Dwight D. Eisenhower
Modern realist: Secretary of State Colin Powell
so d'ya think you could pick a more complex simplistic poll :rollin:
Date: 2005-01-01 07:30 am (UTC):D David...[no, not the other David]
Re: so d'ya think you could pick a more complex simplistic poll :rollin:
Date: 2005-01-01 08:04 am (UTC)Re: so d'ya think you could pick a more complex simplistic poll :rollin:
Date: 2005-01-01 08:18 am (UTC)Re: so d'ya think you could pick a more complex simplistic poll :rollin:
Date: 2005-01-01 09:26 am (UTC)welcome to the neighborhood.
Re: so d'ya think you could pick a more complex simplistic poll :rollin:
Date: 2005-01-01 02:57 pm (UTC)Look who! Welcome to LJ!
no subject
Date: 2005-01-01 02:59 pm (UTC)I'll dig up my notes for you back at school and write out the tenets of classical liberalism if you want.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 01:19 am (UTC)(also, my last sentence should be corrected to read "classical realism." oy.)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 04:19 am (UTC)